<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Web Survey Question of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2009/02/10/bad-web-survey-question-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2009/02/10/bad-web-survey-question-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>Market Research Insights for Technology Companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canek Riestra</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2009/02/10/bad-web-survey-question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Canek Riestra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=71#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Great example.
I find some other issues with the metrics the question provides. Technically speaking, it would be really difficult to manage this scale if you want some parametrics. I mean, what´s the gap between a few days and forever, for example? or even funnier, what´s the (semantic) difference btw &quot;more than a few days&quot; and &quot;forever&quot;??

That´s cool, I like this examples, and even though you can manage to do something with this answer the idea is to do the best analytical work you can, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great example.<br />
I find some other issues with the metrics the question provides. Technically speaking, it would be really difficult to manage this scale if you want some parametrics. I mean, what´s the gap between a few days and forever, for example? or even funnier, what´s the (semantic) difference btw &#8220;more than a few days&#8221; and &#8220;forever&#8221;??</p>
<p>That´s cool, I like this examples, and even though you can manage to do something with this answer the idea is to do the best analytical work you can, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Korostoff</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2009/02/10/bad-web-survey-question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Korostoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=71#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Amazing how often we see these types of errors.  In another recent example, I saw a survey that used totally out of date household types (marital/children status).  They may have been realistic for 99% of the population 20 years ago, but not today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how often we see these types of errors.  In another recent example, I saw a survey that used totally out of date household types (marital/children status).  They may have been realistic for 99% of the population 20 years ago, but not today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Tips for Crafting Better Online Surveys &#124; Dimensional Research Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2009/02/10/bad-web-survey-question-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Tips for Crafting Better Online Surveys &#124; Dimensional Research Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=71#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] There are many ways to make sure your online survey is efficient and effective. One of them, of course, is to avoid asking bad questions.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are many ways to make sure your online survey is efficient and effective. One of them, of course, is to avoid asking bad questions.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

