<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Market Research Incentives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2010/03/08/rethinking-market-research-incentives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2010/03/08/rethinking-market-research-incentives/</link>
	<description>Market Research Insights for Technology Companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Yudin</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2010/03/08/rethinking-market-research-incentives/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Yudin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=396#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Interesting perspective.  We conduct a lot of face to face in 
Canada and we look at the incentive as more of a thank you - good PR for the location.  But also helps motivate the interviewers, not respondents.  They feel better about the survey when offering something, even a token such as a coffee coupon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting perspective.  We conduct a lot of face to face in<br />
Canada and we look at the incentive as more of a thank you &#8211; good PR for the location.  But also helps motivate the interviewers, not respondents.  They feel better about the survey when offering something, even a token such as a coffee coupon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergei Sibirtsev</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2010/03/08/rethinking-market-research-incentives/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergei Sibirtsev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=396#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Excellent case study! Diane, thank you for sharing your experience. 

Actually, we tried to offer an incentive for CATI surveys seven or eight years ago, and we were shocked the response rate deteriorated dramatically. However, we attributed it to the specifics of Russian mentality: people mistrust to any offer they get over the phone. Nevertheless, we never ever used an incentive for CATI surveys ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent case study! Diane, thank you for sharing your experience. </p>
<p>Actually, we tried to offer an incentive for CATI surveys seven or eight years ago, and we were shocked the response rate deteriorated dramatically. However, we attributed it to the specifics of Russian mentality: people mistrust to any offer they get over the phone. Nevertheless, we never ever used an incentive for CATI surveys ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/2010/03/08/rethinking-market-research-incentives/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Kjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimensionalresearch.com/blog/?p=396#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Kudos! This is a great story to read and an interested POV for researchers. I agree that it&#039;s important to recognize the timing of the non-incentive survey version as part of the success. The previous years&#039; work set the foundation for trust, which trust can&#039;t be bought....

My company (an online panel provider for sample via social networks/media) offers only virtual incentives for our respondents. We&#039;ve experimented with cash, points &amp; sweepstakes, in comparison, and virtual incentives were prefered 5 to 1. We were surprised indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos! This is a great story to read and an interested POV for researchers. I agree that it&#8217;s important to recognize the timing of the non-incentive survey version as part of the success. The previous years&#8217; work set the foundation for trust, which trust can&#8217;t be bought&#8230;.</p>
<p>My company (an online panel provider for sample via social networks/media) offers only virtual incentives for our respondents. We&#8217;ve experimented with cash, points &amp; sweepstakes, in comparison, and virtual incentives were prefered 5 to 1. We were surprised indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
